This lesson is still being designed and assembled (Pre-Alpha version)

Introduction to metadata

Overview

Teaching: 10 min
Exercises: 20 min
Questions
  • What is metadata?

  • What do we use metadata for?

Objectives
  • Recognise what metadata is

  • Distinguish different types of metadata

  • Understand what makes metadata interoperable

  • Know how to decide what to include in metadata

What is (or are) metadata?

Simply put, metadata is the data about the data. Does this sound confusing? Let’s clarify: metadata is the description of your data. It allows others to gain deeper understanding about your data and provides insight for its interpretation. Hence, you should consider your metadata as important as your data. Further, metadata plays a very important role in making your data FAIR. It has to be continuously added to your research data (not just at the beginning or end of your project!). Metadata can be produced in an automated way (e.g.: when you create a microscopy image usually the accompanying software saves metadata on it) or manually.

Let’s take a look at an example:

This is a confocal microscopy image of a C. elegans nematode strain used as a proteostasis model (Pretty! Isn’t it?). The image is part of the raw data associated to Goya et al., 2020, which was deposited in a Public Omero Server.

nematode_confocal_microscopy_image Figure credits: María Eugenia Goya

. What information can you guess without the associated description (metadata)?

Let’s see the associated metadata to the image and the dataset to which it belongs:

Image metadata

Name: OP50 D10Ad_06.czi Image ID: 3485 Owner: Maria Eugenia Goya ORCID: 0000-0002-5031-2470

Acquisition Date: 2018-12-12 17:53:55 Import Date: 2020-04-30 22:38:59 Dimensions (XY): 1344 x 1024 Pixels Type: uint16 Pixels Size (XYZ) (µm): 0.16 x 0.16 x 1.00 Z-sections/Timepoints: 56 x 1 Channels: TL DIC, TagYFP ROI Count: 0

Tags: time course; day 10; adults; food switching; E. coli OP50; NL5901; C. elegans

Dataset metadata

Name: Figure2_Figure2B Dataset ID: 263 Owner: Maria Eugenia Goya ORCID: 0000-0002-5031-2470

Description: The datasets contains a time course of α-syn aggregation in NL5901 C. elegans worms after a food switch at the L4 stage:

E. coli OP50 to OP50 Day 01 adults Day 03 adults Day 05 adults Day 07 adults Day 10 adults Day 13 adults

E. coli OP50 to B. subtilis PXN21 Day 01 adults Day 03 adults Day 05 adults Day 07 adults Day 10 adults Day 13 adults

Images were taken at 6 developmental timepoints (D1Ad, D3Ad, D5Ad, D7Ad, D10Ad, D13Ad)

* Some images contain more than one nematode.

Each image contains ~30 (or more) Z-sections, 1 µmeters apart. The TagYFP channel is used to follow the alpha-synuclein particles. The TL DIC channel is used to image the whole nematode head.

These images were used to construct Figure 2B of the Cell Reports paper (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.078).

Creation date: 2020-04-30 22:16:39

Tags: protein aggregation; time course; E. coli OP50 to B. subtilis PXN21; food switching; E. coli OP50; 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.078; NL5901; C. elegans

This is a lot of information!

Types of metadata

According to How to FAIR we can distinguish between three main types of metadata:

Descriptive and structural metadata should be added continuously throughout the project.

Where does data end and metadata starts?

What is “data” and what is “metadata” is can be a matter of perspective: Some researchers’ metadata can be other researchers’ data.

For example, a funding body is a typical administrative metadata, however, it can be used to calculate numbers of public datasets per funder. And then used to compare effect of different funders’ policies on open practices.

Identifying metadata types (3+2 minutes)

Here we have an excel spreadsheet that contains project metadata for a made-up experiment of plant metabolites Metadata in data table example Figure credits: Tomasz Zielinski and Andrés Romanowski

In groups, identify different types of metadata (administrative, descriptive, structural) present in this example.

Solution

  • Administrative metadata marked in blue
  • Descriptive metadata marked in orange
  • Structural metadata marked in green metadata-full-spreadhseet Figure credits: Tomasz Zielinski and Andrés Romanowski

Being precise

If the metadata purpose is to help understand the data, it has to be done in a precise and “understandable” way i.e. it has to be interoperable. To be interoperable metadata should use a formal, accessible, shared, and broadly applicable terms/language for knowledge representation.

One of the easiest examples is the problem of author disambiguation.

Why we need ORCID

After Libarary Carpentry FAIR Data

Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID)

Have you ever done a search in pubmed and found that you have doppelganger? So how can you uniquely associate something you created to just you and no other researcher that has the same name?

ORCID iD is a free, unique, persistent identifier that you own and control—forever. It distinguishes you from every other researcher across disciplines, borders, and time.

ORCIDs of authors of this episode are:

You can connect your iD with your professional information—affiliations, grants, publications, peer review, and more. You can use your iD to share your information with other systems, ensuring you get recognition for all your contributions, saving you time and hassle, and reducing the risk of errors.

If you do not have an ORCID, you should register to get one!

ORCID provides the registry of researchers, so they can be precisely identified. Similarly, there are other registries that can be used to identify many of biological concepts and entities:

NCBI or BioPortal are good places to start searching for a registry or a term.

Public ID in action (3)

Wellcome Open Research journal uses ORCID to identify authors.

  • Open one of our papers doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15341.2 and check how public IDs as ORCID can be used to interlink information.
  • The second metadata example (the Excel table) contains two other types of public IDs. Can you find them? Can you find the meaning behind those Ids?

If you have not done it yet, register yourself at ORCID

Solution

ORCID is used to link to authors profiles which list their other publications.

The metadata example contains genes IDs from The Arabidopsis Information Resource TAIR and metabolites IDs from KEGG

Adding metadata to your experiments

Good metadata are crucial for assuring re-usability of your outcomes. Adding metadata is also very time-consuming process if done manually, so collecting metadata should be done incrementally during your experiment.

As we saw metadata can take many forms from as simple as including a ReadMe.txt file, by embedding them inside the Excel files, to using domain specific metadata standard and format.

But,

For many assay methods and experiment types, there are defined recomendations and guidelines called Minimal Information Standards.

Minimal Information Standard

The minimum information standard is a set of guidelines for reporting data derived by relevant methods in biosciences. If followed, it ensures that the data can be easily verified, analysed and clearly interpreted by the wider scientific community. Keeping with these recommendations also facilitates the foundation of structuralized databases, public repositories and development of data analysis tools. The individual minimum information standards are brought by the communities of cross-disciplinary specialists focused on the problematic of the specific method used in experimental biology.

Minimum Information for Biological and Biomedical Investigations (MIBBI) is the collection of the most known standards.

FAIRSharing offers excellent search service for finding standards

What can you do if there are no metadata standards defined for your data / field of research?

Think about the minimum information that someone else (from your lab or from any other lab in the world) would need to know about your dataset to be able to work with it without any further inputs from you.

Think as a consumer of your data not the producer!

What to include - discussion (5+5 minutes)

Think of the data you generate in your projects, and imagine you are going to share them.

What information would another researcher need to understand or reproduce your data (the structural metadata)?

For example, we believe that any dataset should have:

  • a name/title
  • its purpose or experimental hypothesis

Write down and compare your proposals, can we find some common elements?

Solution

Some typical elements are:

  • biological material, e.g. Spciecies, Genotypes, Tissues type, Age, Health conditions
  • biological context, e.g. speciment growth, entrainment, samples prepartions
  • experimental factors and conditions, e.g. drug treatments, stress factors
  • specifics of data aquisition
  • specifics of data processing and analysis

Metadata and FAIR guidelines

Metadata provides extreme valuable information for us and others to be able to interpret, process, reuse and reproduce the research data it accompanies.

Because metadata are data about data, all of the FAIR principles i.e. Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable apply to metadata.

Ideally, metadata should not only be machine-readable, but also interoperable so that they can interlink or reasoned about by computer systems.

Attribution

Content of this episode was adapted from:

Ed_DaSH

Key Points

  • Metadata provides contextual information so that other people can understand the data.

  • Metadata is key for data reuse and complying with FAIR guidelines.

  • Metadata should be added incrementally throught out the project